Tuesday, October 4, 2022


The Federal Labour Courtroom (Bundesarbeitsgericht) dominated on 29 April 2021 (docket quantity: 8 AZR 267/20) that, in precept, the employer might declare reimbursement of required investigation prices from the worker. Topic to reimbursement are mandatory prices incurred by the intervention of a specialised legislation agency if the employer has commissioned it to conduct investigations into the worker primarily based on a concrete suspicion of great misconduct. The employer should substantiate the need of the prices in every case by exhibiting that the prices are primarily based on an inexpensive suspicion which has been confirmed. Within the particular case, the Federal Labour Courtroom rejected the employer’s declare for damages for investigation prices of a legislation agency as a result of the need of the investigative measures towards the worker weren’t sufficiently substantiated and confirmed in courtroom.

Though the Federal Labour Courtroom units excessive requirements for the reimbursement of investigation prices attributable to the worker’s misconduct, it additionally provides sensible recommendation for such a declare. Consequently, with applicable preparation, reimbursement might be doable in particular person instances sooner or later.

1.  Information

Whistle-blowers supplied details about a possible extreme misconduct of the plaintiff. As a consequence of this particular suspicion, the employer determined to provoke an investigation, performed by an exterior legislation agency. The investigations revealed that the worker had dedicated varied breaches of responsibility to the detriment of the employer with monetary damages within the six-figure vary. In his operate as buying supervisor, the plaintiff allowed himself to be invited by enterprise companions to Champions League matches and likewise made a number of journeys with out official trigger which he charged to the employer. Following the preliminary investigations, the plaintiff was given extraordinary termination with out discover.  After the plaintiff’s motion for cover towards dismissal was rejected by a closing courtroom resolution, the employer demanded compensation for the prices of the legislation agency that had investigated the worker’s alleged breaches of responsibility. The Labour Courtroom dismissed the counterclaim for damages, the second occasion upheld it to the extent of EUR 66,500.

2.  Ruling

The Federal Labour Courtroom dominated that an employer’s declare for damages typically extends to the prices incurred on account of the intervention of a specialised legislation agency if the next circumstances are fulfilled:

    • the legislation agency was commissioned to analyze the worker on the event of a concrete suspicion of great misconduct on the a part of the worker, and
    • the worker was convicted by the investigation of a critical intentional breach of contractual responsibility or a tortious act, and
    • the character and extent of the investigative measures had been mandatory for an inexpensive, economically-minded employer underneath the circumstances of the person case.

Due to his intentional behaviour the worker couldn’t discuss with the availability which regulates that within the first occasion of the labour courtroom proceedings every occasion has to bear its personal lawyer’s charges (part 12a Labour Courtroom Act [Arbeitsgerichtsgesetz]). The Courtroom said that in such a case the applying of this provision was inappropriate.

As well as, the Courtroom specified that not solely inside investigations are essentially required. Such investigations will also be carried out by exterior consultants, for instance if there should not sufficient capacities or not sufficient educated workers inside the firm itself.

The courtroom’s necessities for proving the need of the investigative measures are extremely related in apply. On the one hand, the time spent, and the measures taken, have to be clearly specified with regard to every alleged conduct. As well as, the recoverable prices of fact-finding have to be distinguished from authorized recommendation.

3.  Conclusion

Good preparation and documentation throughout the investigation are important for profitable reimbursement. What’s required is a precise documentation of the investigative measures based on sort and scope, for instance in a desk. Every investigative step must be recorded with the related suspicion, the time spent for investigations and the consequence. As well as, it must be proven whether or not any outcomes of the investigation have given rise to additional investigations.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments